Voir dire literally means “speak the truth.” In court, it refers to a process of determining whether a juror can serve fairly and impartially, i.e., jury selection.
Creates an atmosphere of trust & confidence, helping jurors feel as though they’re engaging in a genuine and meaningful conversation as opposed to an interrogation
“Sets the stage” by explaining the process and emphasizing honesty and candor
Gets jurors talking with open-ended, reflective questions
Attends to jurors’ nonverbal communication and group dynamics
Looks for leadership (e.g., forepersons)
What are jurors’ occupations, educational backgrounds, socio-economic statuses, media viewing habits and internet footprints, among other characteristics, and how may those characteristics affect jurors’ decisions in the case?
What experiences do jurors bring to the case? Have they been a victim of a crime or involved in a prior lawsuit? What else could affect how they view the case, evidence, witnesses and parties?
As decisionmakers, jurors’ opinions, beliefs, and values are key to voir dire. A skilled psychologist can ask layered questions utilizing attunement, emotional regulation, cultural humility, and nonverbal cues. Such questions will help identify the filter or framework through which jurors will view the case.
We analyze jurors’ responses, conducting follow-up questioning as needed, and advising on cause challenges and the prioritization of peremptory strikes. Once the jury is seated, we provide an assessment of the panel as a whole, along with a summary of each juror’s demographics and case-related experiences. Additionally, we offer recommendations for case presentation and witness preparation based on the seated jury’s unique characteristics.
Before trial, we assist by drafting voir dire
questions carefully designed to uncover jurors’ attitudes and experiences, helping to identify key candidates for strikes. We can also review your proposed questions and offer guidance on crafting effective follow-ups.
When permissible, juror questionnaires offer a strategic advantage, allowing for deeper insights into juror attitudes and experiences without influencing the entire panel with individual responses. We can design the questionnaire and assist in making a compelling case to the court for its use. After evaluating completed questionnaires, we rank jurors, recommend follow-up questions, and provide guidance on peremptory and cause challenges.
Christine Gerchow, Ph.D., QME, is a seasoned psychologist with over ten years of clinical and administrative experience in high-stakes, high-pressure environments, spanning the corrections and workers’ compensation systems. Dr. Gerchow received rigorous assessment training at UC Berkeley, where she also lectured on consultation practices. She possesses a unique blend of skills in emotional regulation, interviewing techniques, and interpersonal dynamics, making her an exceptional trial and voir dire consultant.